Thursday, October 24, 2013

Is the Internet really a game changer?

I realize the irony of putting this topic out for discussion online, but that's kinda the point of this one.

I've spent three of the past six weekends at various provincial AGM's - for ArtsLink NB, the Union of NB Municipalities, and Music NB weekend. At home, normally I'm on the organizational side of events, so it's been interesting to be a fly-on-the-wall at these meetings.

A few observations:

1. It's increasingly important to speak both English and French or at least have a decent working knowledge of both official languages.  Especially in the cultural sector, because the Acadian community is so organized and we in Anglo NB have much to learn from them.

2. The biggest challenges to our successes in NB - regardless of industry - are geography and communication.  It's extremely difficult to keep people in the loop, even with today's social networks and communication technology, in a province where people are so spread out.

Add to that the fact that most people go about their day-to-day routines trying to block out excess information in our media-saturated environment, and the result is that people who have common economic or organizational interests are frequently isolated from each other.

3. On the other hand, finding information is easier than ever, for people who go looking.  This means that challenging official narratives and information - shale gas being an important case in point - is being done more frequently.

At these events, I am often the only person from rural western New Brunswick. Sometimes I find people from the cities have a tendency to explain things to me that I am already aware of, because I read it online.  I read a lot online, mostly because I am too endlessly fascinated by how the world works to quit.

Sometimes I would like to tell these people that "we have the same Internet in Woodstock."

This leads me to wonder: is the internet really a game changer?  ie. Will having access to lots of information really help people in rural areas and small towns be more self-sufficient, better citizens, and create thriving centers of cultural and economic innovation?

Or is it the old maxim "it's not what you know, it's who you know" still true?

I have to admit, I feel like meeting two or three good new contacts accomplishes a lot more than being alone in a room, reading a screen.

I can see how people want to share information and work together, and the internet does facilitate those kinds of collaborations.  However, I don't think it can ever replace the social ties and weak social capital that come from random encounters with colleagues (I met someone I'd been trying to meet in an elevator at one of the conferences - finally) or being in the same room when a major announcement is made.

Does the internet help us build communities based on common interests?  Or does it just isolate us more?


2 comments:

MMan said...

It changes the game for people who are explorers already.

In this day and age, Ignorance is now a choice, sadly an all to popular one.
You hit the nail on the head with so many options available.
But it's been going in that direction for awhile, i.e., Horse racing is all but dead because people find it more convenient to buy scratch tickets on their own.

I guess most of what I could say is you already said, and I agree.
Game changer yes, Game winner no.

Unknown said...

The internet is a tool, and should be used as such. It cannot be the be all, end all. It needs to be used to enhance our knowledge and connections, but face to face interaction and setting-based experience is just as important, if not more.

I think the internet has the capability to be a wonderful tool, and is often used as such, but it is also used as a time-waster. Like any tool, though, it's not its fault it exists or how it's used. We should be more discerning about how we apply its use. How often do we see flippant, cynical internet comments (I'm aware of the irony of my complaining about internet commenters in an internet comment) that add absolutely nothing to the conversation? If that person was with others and said that, and was taken to task for it, he/she would be more likely to actually defend the position in a discussion. As it is, it's just bashing our heads against the wall.

/ramble